“Science” and “Science Advocacy“
with this picture?
Therefore, it must be dismissed because it does not prove your point.
Why “peer review” is the gold standard?
Yes, there are many meanings to the title. How science (the subject) has become politicized. How Science (the magazine) has become politicalized. How questioning certain supposedly scientific topics have become taboo to discuss. How “peer reviewed” has become meaningless, if the editor has a political axe to grind.
Take your pick.
Advice from Watergate applies to most things. Including the Paris climate talks.
At least real science is not. Unreal science, well that’s another matter.